Living Reviews in Landscape Research Living Reviews in Landscape Research is a peer-reviewed open access journal publishing invited reviews that summarise and evaluate the state of the art as well as future needs in the interdisciplinary domains of landscape research. LRLR is published by the Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany. LRLR, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, landscape research, review article, journal, open access, ZALF, agriculture, forestry, recreation, tourism, nature conservation http://landscaperesearch.livingreviews.org/ 1863-7329 en Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) copyright Max Planck Society journal 2012-07-11 authorOrder lrlr-2010-3-mertensmartha 5 Institute for Environmental Decisions, Department of Environmental Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland & transdisciplinarity-net, Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, Berne, Switzerland author hirschhadorngertrude Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn Gertrude Hirsch is a Titular Professor at the Department of Environmental Sciences of ETH Zurich. She got a Ph.D. in educational sciences at the University of Zurich and was a private lecturer in philosophy at the University of Constance. Her research interests include the philosophy of environmental sciences, the methodology of transdisciplinary research and ethical issues of climate change. From 2003-2008 she has been acting as president of td-net for transdisciplinary research (Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, www.transdisciplinarity.ch) and in 2000 she has joined the scientific board of the journal GAIA - ecological perspectives for science and society (www.ingentaconnect.com/content/oekom/gaia). authorOrder lrlr-2009-1-antropmarc 2 authorOrder lrlr-2007-2-tyrvainenliisa 2 Landscape Ecology and Recovery Science, NW Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, 2725 Montlake Blvd. East, Seattle, WA, 98112, USA author feistblake Blake E. Feist Blake Feist has been an ecologist at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NOAA-NMFS) since 1999. His research focuses on two general areas: the relationship between fish populations and their terrestrial/estuarine habitat; and the interaction between non-indigenous species and estuarine food webs and ecosystems. He applies the principles of landscape ecology for most of his research, but he is also interested in the effects of climate, spatio-temporal scaling, and anthropogenic influences on ecosystems. Blake has a B.S. in Zoology from the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Fishery and Aquatic Sciences from the University of Washington. authorOrder lrlr-2009-2-haasedagmar 1 Center for Landscape and Culture, Estonian Institute of Humanities,Tallinn University, Estonia author semmkadri Kadri Semm Kadri Semm is a PhD student in cultural studies at Tallinn University, Estonia. She also works as a research assistant at the Center for Landscape and Culture at Tallinn University. Her research interest lies in the use of the concept of the term 'milieu' in the urban planning practice. Her current investigation is dealing with everyday landscapes, neighborhood communities and with the creation of urban atmospheres in the street photography. Department of Botany, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, U.S.A. & transdisciplinarity-net, Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, Berne, Switzerland & Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland author kuefferchristoph Christoph Kueffer Christoph Kueffer is a research scientist at the Department of Botany, University of Hawaii at Manoa, and a lecturer for Environmental Sciences at the Department of Information Technology and Electric Engineering, ETH Zurich. He holds a PhD in plant ecology from ETH Zurich, and is a member of the editorial board of 'Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics' (www.elsevier.de/ppees). His current research is focused on plant invasions in oceanic island and mountain ecosystems, among others as the coordinator of the Mountain Invasion Research Network (MIREN, www.miren.ethz.ch). His involvements with transdisciplinary research include his work as a scientific collaborator of the td-net for transdisciplinary research (Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, www.transdisciplinarity.ch), a member of the working group 'knowledge exchange' of the Swiss Academic Society for Environmental Research and Ecology (SAGUF), and a founder and steering committee member of seed sustainability - the platform of student based transdisciplinary research in the field of sustainability (www.seed-sustainability.ch). He has worked as a consultant for organisations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN and the Seychelles Ministry of Environment. Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Dept. of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Max-Emanuel-Strasse 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria author trautweinclemens Clemens Trautwein Clemens Trautwein is PhD student at the Institute of Hydrobiology and involved in a modelling group with focus on stream ecology. He got his degree in landscape management at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences in 2007. Main field of work covers land use analysis in European catchments and various spatial extents of investigation, data acquisition of human impacts on rivers and ecosystem analysis. Current research focus lies on identifying and modelling land use-pressure-fish cause and effect cascades in European streams. Landscape Ecology and Recovery Science, NW Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, 2725 Montlake Blvd. East, Seattle, WA, 98112, USA author fullertonaimee Aimee H. Fullerton Aimee is an aquatic ecologist working as part of the Landscape Ecology team at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center (since 2002). There, she has investigated viability of endangered salmonid populations using landscape ecology approaches. Her specific research interests include spatial structure of aquatic populations, especially those living in dendritic stream networks; relationship between spatio-temporal scale and ecological patterns and processes; climate change impacts to aquatic systems; influence of nonindigenous species on native aquatic fauna; and ways that science can contribute to improved decision-making. Aimee received her M.S. in aquatic ecology from the University of Notre Dame in 1998, and will begin doctorate studies at the University of Washington in 2010. Department of Geography, University of Ghent, Krijgslaan 281 S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium author antropmarc Marc Antrop Dr. Marc Antrop (1946) is geographer specialised in landscapes sciences, remote sensing, GIS and planning. He is professor who lectured at the University of Ghent (Belgium) courses in landscape science, landscape management and planning, environmental impact assessment and GIS). He is member of the National Committee of Geography of the Academy of Sciences and vice-president of the Royal Committee for Protection of Monuments and Landscapes in Flanders. In 2003 he received the Distinguished Scholarship Award of the International Association for Landscape Ecology and was proclaimed doctor honoris causa at the University of Tartu (Estonia) in 2007. His landscape research is integrated and really holistic, covering and integrating aspects of landscape genesis (in particular focusing upon the natural and cultural aspects of the European landscapes), landscape perception, landscape evaluation and land assessment, landscape ecology and landscape architecture. Practical application of this knowledge is achieved in planning and environmental impact assessment and monitoring land degradation. His main work areas are Europe, the Mediterranean, Egypt. Ghent University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Coupue Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium author vanhuylenbroeckguido Guido Van Huylenbroeck Prof. dr. ir. Guido Van Huylenbroeck is professor in Agricultural and rural environmental economics at the University of Ghent since 1995. His experience is particularly developed in agricultural policy, economic valuation of natural resources, rural development and agri-environmental policies, transaction cost and property rights issues in environmental regulations, economic analysis of collective innovation projects in agriculture, optimal strategies in land consolidation projects and analysis of structural developments in different sectors. Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Dayangfang, Beiyuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, PR China author zhanghuiyuan Huiyuan Zhang Dr. Zhang is the director of the Department of Ecological Environment of CAEP. His fields of expertise include regional ecological protection, ecological evaluation and biodiversity science. As a team leader, Zhang Huiyuan is taking part in National Basic Research Program, National Natural Science Foundation and the CCICED ecological compensation mechanism and policies, and PES program in Australia-China Environmental Development Partnership (ACEDP) Project. Over the past years, during the 11th and 12th Five-year Plan Period, Dr. Zhang has headed the development of Plan for Protection of Ecological Environment for the Three Routes of the South-North Water Transfer Project, Plan for Key National Ecological Function Reserves, Special Plan for Ecological Protection. Dr. Zhang has published 3 monographs and more than 50 academic papers. authorOrder lrlr-2010-2-alvessusana 2 3 publication lrlr-2009-2 Simulation Models on Human--Nature Interactions in Urban Landscapes: A Review Including Spatial Economics, System Dynamics, Cellular Automata and Agent-based Approaches 2009-04-09 2009-04-02 2009-03-04 feedback cellular automata simulation models system dynamics land use change causalities urban landscape review agent-based model Urbanisation belongs to the most complex and dynamic processes of land use and landscape change. At present, we claim ``the millennium of the cities,'' since more than half of the currently 6.6 billion world population is living in urban areas. Due to the huge impact of urban land consumption on environment and landscape, this paper provides a review of existing urban land use models. The review analyses non-spatially explicit economic and system dynamics models, spatially explicit cellular automata and agent-based model approaches by addressing the respective conceptual approach, model components and causal relationships, including feedbacks. Based upon the review, conclusions are drawn regarding the future development of urban landscape models, as well as on indispensable causal relationships and their representation when modelling urban systems. 2 5 publication lrlr-2011-2 Payment for Ecosystem Services in China: An Overview 2011-06-22 2011-06-09 2011-01-27 PES programs ecosystem services PES in China compensation To address the multiplying conservation challenges and resource constraints in face of breakneck economic growth, policymakers in China have become increasingly interested in developing new approaches in environmental policy. For this reason, Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) is becoming a topic of discussion in society. This paper provides a general review of PES in China from both a theoretical and a practical perspective. It starts with an outline of relevant terms used by the international community, and is followed by a discussion of major components covered in PES for implementation, including basic principles, methods to determine compensation standards and approaches. The main PES programmes that have been implemented are presented. The paper reveals that PES in China has unique characteristics, compared to other countries, and that the necessary policy frameworks for developing PES and purely market-based instruments in China are rapidly taking shape. However, to successfully implement PES, the relations and conflicts between central government and local governments, between the government and the market, and between PES and poverty alleviation must be taken into consideration. 2 Ghent University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Coupue Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium author mettepenningenevy Evy Mettepenningen Evy Mettepenningen obtained a master in Bioscience Engineering at the University of Ghent in 2005, and is working on a PhD at the same University, in the Faculty of Bioscience Engineering. The topic of her PhD is a new institutional analysis of agri-environmental schemes, mainly focussing on the transaction costs involved. Her main fields of interest are the relationship between agriculture and the natural environment, rural development and in particular agri-environmental policy, transaction costs involved in these policies, multifunctional agriculture and rural cooperation. authorOrder lrlr-2010-3-winkelbirgit 3 authorOrder lrlr-2009-1-marjariho 4 authorOrder lrlr-2009-2-schwarznina 2 shengkui Beijing, China ebMember cheng Shengkui Cheng Editor in Chief Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Dept. of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Max-Emanuel-Strasse 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria author schmutzstefan Stefan Schmutz Main interests of Stefan Schmutz are in fish ecology and modelling of complex aquatic ecosystems. He recently has coordinated EU projects (FAME, EFI+) targeting at assessment of ecological status of running waters according to the Water Framework Directive. Further research interests are impacts and mitigation of hydropower and channelisation effects, fish pass technologies, habitat modelling and restoration of running waters in Austria and EU. He teaches courses at the BOKU in aquatic ecology and river management. zurlini Lecce, Italy ebMember zurlini Giovanni Zurlini authorOrder lrlr-2010-4-palanghannes 2 authorOrder lrlr-2007-1-schulzmarcus 1 Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Universität Wien, A-1030 Rennweg 14, Vienna, Austria author schleifersabine Sabine Schleifer Sabine Schleifer is a MSc candidate at the University of Vienna, Department of Nature Conservation, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology. Her main research interests are landscape ecology and nature conservation related issues. In her diploma thesis she deals with the relationship between landscape structure and ecosystem services with special regard to viticultural landscapes. She has already gained experiences in national and international projects focusing on the assessment of ecosystem services in transnational ecological networks. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning (ILEN), A-1190 Vienna, Austria author proebstlulrike Ulrike Pröbstl Ulrike Pröbstl is Univ. Professor for Landcape development, recreation and tourism at the BOKU University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna. Actual research projects are deal-ing with nature based tourism and recreation - with a special focus on forest as well as Natura 2000 -, possible impacts of climate change on nature based tourism and tourism related to protected areas. Further research task are focussed on landscape development in the sensitive alpine area and the implementation of planning frameworks like SEA, EIA, Auditing systems and other. She is member of various professional bodies on a national, european and international level. 1 publication lrlr-2007-3 Multifunctionality of Agriculture: A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments 2007-06-25 2007-04-17 2007-04-06 institutional arrangements agricultural policy multifunctional agriculture In this contribution we try to look at the new role for agriculture in rural areas by reviewing the concept of multifunctional agriculture as well as the analytical frameworks used. Next, we review the existing evidence about the multifunctional role of farming. Although not overwhelming, the existing literature shows that agriculture contributes to the rural wealth not only through the production of commodities, but also by the delivery of non-tradable goods. This contribution can be both direct through increased values for properties or economic benefits in the tourism sector, but also indirect through conservation of rural heritage or agri-ecological systems. Next we focus on how this role of agriculture can be stimulated. It is argued that multifunctionality can be a unifying principle to bring the productive and non-productive functions into harmony. This requires the development of new institutional arrangements and a major change in policy incentives. 3 authorOrder lrlr-2009-1-manderulo 5 authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-hughesrobert 2 Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Weberplatz 1, D-01217 Dresden, Germany author walzulrich Ulrich Walz Dr. Ulrich Walz studied geography and landscape ecology at the Universities of Stuttgart and Hohenheim. In 2000 he graduated to the theme of the characterisation and assessment of the land use structure with methods of geoinformatics and remote sensing at the University of Dresden. He is now a senior researcher and leader of the expert group "Landscape Ecology and landscape planning" at the IÖR. Research activities are focused on the analysis and assessment of impacts and effects of the land use change on the environment. He has extensive experience in methods and tools of remote sensing and GIS for landscape assessment. Special research interest concerns the relation of landscape structure and ecological functions at the landscape level, in particular the effects of changes of spatial patterns on biodiversity are investigated. Actual key areas of his work are indicators for the landscape structure and biodiversity, historical landscape analysis and information systems. 1 publication lrlr-2007-1 Runoff of Pesticides: Achievements and Limitations of Modelling Agrochemical Dislocation from Non-Point Sources at Various Landscape Related Scales 2007-06-25 2007-03-07 2007-02-13 hydrological models upscaling runoff leaching models pesticides erosion models probabilistic approach In the absence of drainage systems, runoff is a major transport pathway of pesticides from agricultural areas to aquatic systems. We provide an overview of existing runoff models eligible to describe the transport and fate of pesticides in the terrestrial environment. We distinguish between leaching, erosion, and hydrological models. Recent developments in runoff modelling include the evolution of complex deterministic models, combinations of models and probabilistic approaches on a GIS-platform. The latter enable users to make geo-referenced predictions of diffuse pesticide emissions from small to large scales. Simulated loads mostly correlate well with measured pesticide loads and concentrations on a catchment scale, but often overestimate measured concentrations, because the edge-to-field approach applied does not consider any attenuation by degradation or sorption between the location of pesticide application and surface waters. Therefore, future developments of horizontal pesticide transport models should focus on detention and retention mechanisms during transport on highly resolved temporal and spatial scales. Additionally, for the simulation of realistic scenarios of pesticide emissions on a catchment scale, the evaluation and standardization of probabilistic approaches can be helpful. 1 National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan author fukushimamichio Michio Fukushima Michio Fukushima is a Senior Researcher at the National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan. He has been a member of the Salmonid Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, IUCN since 2007. He received his PhD in Fisheries from the University of Alaska Fairbanks in 1996. His current research focuses on freshwater fish migration and on the effects of dams for the fishes in the Mekong River. US Geological Survey, Leetown Science Center, Aquatic Ecology Branch, 11649 Leetown Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA author youngjohn John A. Young John Young is a Research Biologist (Biogeographer) focusing on applying GIS, remote sensing, and spatial modeling tools to enhance understanding and management of trust species and their habitats. Since 1994, he has led efforts at the US Geological Survey's Leetown Science Center to incorporate spatial analysis into research examining landscape influences on aquatic and terrestrial biota. Past research has focused on watershed analysis, land use impacts on fish and amphibian communities, impacts of eastern hemlock decline on stream fish communities, and development of an invasive species tracking system for the State of Delaware (USA). Currently, he is leading research examining the use of advanced remote sensing technologies such as LiDAR and hyperspectral imaging for examination of upland and aquatic habitat patterning, as well as leading research creating regional spatial models to predict the potential range and population characteristics of American ginseng, a plant species at risk to poaching. He received his B.A. and M.S. degrees in Geography from Virginia Tech in 1987 and 1992 respectively. authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-feistblake 9 5 publication lrlr-2011-1 The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review 2011-03-26 2011-02-21 2010-06-18 landscape services/functions classifying quantifying and mapping valuation ecosystem services/functions The awareness that natural and semi-natural ecosystems provide benefits to human society, which are of great economic, ecological and socio-cultural value, can be dated back to the mid-1960s and early 1970s. More recently, there has been an almost exponential growth in publications on the benefits of natural ecosystems to human society. However, despite the enhancing interest in ecosystem service research, still many open questions remain to fully integrate the ecosystem service concept in landscape research and decision making. The paper aims at providing the state-of-the-art of ecosystem service assessment regarding landscape research and to present a coherent knowledge base for further discussions. First the paper gives an overview of the different ways defining and classifying ecosystem services. Five selected typologies, very common in the literature are discussed in detail. The second main part of this review focuses on quantifying and mapping ecosystem services as well as on the different valuation approaches. As there are still a lot of challenges that have to be faced regarding quantifying, visualising as well as valuing ecosystem services the paper emphasizes the importance of further research, initiatives and projects to improve the implementation of the ecosystem service concept in environmental planning and management at all levels of decision making. To meet all these challenges research effort needs to be conducted side by side to understand underlying relationships and to improve ecological as well as socio-economic understanding. 1 Ghent University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Coupue Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium author vandermeulenvalerie Valerie Vandermeulen Valerie Vandermeulen has obtained a master of science in economics at the University of Ghent and is now working on her PhD at the same University, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering on the topic of development strategies for peri-urban farmers in Belgium. Her main fields of interest contain multifunctional agriculture and related survival strategies, planning discourses for farming within specific environmental conditions, future land requirements by agriculture in Flanders and the relationship between regional identity and multifunctional agriculture. authorOrder lrlr-2007-3-vandermeulenvalerie 2 Institute for Biodiversity - Network, Regensburg, Germany author mertensmartha Martha Mertens Dr. Martha Mertens studied Biology at the University of Munich and at Reed College in Portland, Oregon. She received an additional degree of Environmental Protection Techniques at the Technical University of Munich. Her main fields of interests are environmental impacts of genetically modified organisms and, in particular, potential effects of GM plants on biodiversity. She is member of the science and business experts network of the Institute for Biodiversity. authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-schmutzstefan 4 OPENspace Research Centre, Edinburgh College of Art, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK and Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51014 Tartu, Estonia Edinburgh College of Art, Art & Design, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9DF author bellsimon Simon Bell Simon Bell is Senior Research fellow at Edinburgh College of Art and by background a forester and landscape architect with special interest in access to the outdoors, forests and remoter landscapes. He has been involved in projects of recreation design in the UK, Canada, Ireland Latvia and Russia. Past research includes 'Local Use of Woodlands in Central Scotland' for the Forestry Commission, 'Crossplan', an EU funded project about participatory landscape planning as a tool for rural develop-ment. Simon is also Associate Professor at the Estonian University of Life Sciences in Tartu, Estonia, department of landscape architecture. Currently Simon is the chair of COST E33 on “Forest recreation and nature tourism. Simon Bell is Senior Research Fellow and Associate Director fo the OPENspace Research Centre at Edinburgh College of Art and Professor of Landscape Architecture at the Estonian University of Life Sciences. By background he is a forester and landscape architect with special interest in access to the outdoors, forests and remoter landscapes. He has been involved in projects of recreation design in the UK, Canada, Ireland Latvia and Russia. Past research includes 'Local Use of Woodlands in Central Scotland' for the Forestry Commission, 'Crossplan', an EU funded project about participatory landscape planning as a tool for rural development, the chair of COST E33 on “Forest recreation and nature tourism” and more recently, the EU 6th Framework Programme Integrated Project PLUREL: peri-urban land use relationships. Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Kurt-Wolters-Str. 3, D-34109 Kassel, Germany author priessjoerg Jörg A. Priess Joerg A. Priess has a scientific background in ecology and forestry. For the last ten years he is studying land-use change dynamics, at the regional and larger scales. He is focussing on socio-environmental impacts of land-use dynamics and links and feedbacks between the antroposphere and the environment. He is the main developer of an integrated land-use modeling framework, which is currently being adapted and applied in different case study regions. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany author schwarznina Nina Schwarz Nina Schwarz ist a post-doctoral researcher at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in the Department of Computational Landscape Ecology. She is interested in urban land use, climate regulation as urban ecosystem service and agent-based modelling. Currently, she is involved in a project on peri-urban land use relationships in Europe. Her background is environmental sciences, and she got a PhD in social and economic sciences at the University of Kassel, Germany. University of Osnabrück, Institute of Environmental Systems Research (USF), 49069 Osnabrück, Germany author matthiesmichael Michael Matthies Prof. Dr. Michael Matthies is the Head of the Institute of Environmental Systems Research. He studied physics and chemistry at the universities of Münster and München. His main research interests is environmental systems science, in particular exposure modelling and risk assessment of pollutants. He is currently involved in several research projects on chemical fate modelling on local, regional and global scale, georeferenced exposure assessment and river basin management. authorOrder lrlr-2010-3-schuettegesine 2 University of Oxford, School of Geography & Environment, OX1 3TB, UK author simpsonmurray Murray Simpson Murray is a Research Scientist at Oxford University Centre for the Environment, a consultant in tourism and sustainable development and has worked at senior executive and board level in industry. His current work includes the interrelations between tourism and the environment, sustainable livelihoods analysis and liaison with communities and public and private stakeholders; bridging the gaps between research, policy and practice. He is a member of the executive committee of the peak international organization ‘Experts in Climate Change and Tourism’ (eCLAT), a Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society, a member of the Int’l Human Dimensions Program on Global Environmental Change (IHDP-GEC) UK committee and a member of the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) Panel of Tourism Experts. He has authored and contributed to numerous UNWTO and peer-reviewed publications, and worked on projects in Europe, Australasia, South Africa, USA, Asia, South America and the Caribbean. Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise St., Tartu, Estonia, 51014 author uuemaaevelin Evelin Uuemaa Dr. Evelyn Uuemaa (1980) is a Researh Scientist at the Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia. She studied geography at the University of Tartu (BSc 2004, MSc 2005) and defended her PhD thesis in landscape ecology and environmental protection in 2007. Her main fields of interest are landscape pattern and the relationships between landscape pattern and water quality, landscape metrics, urban landscape pattern and its change in time. She has published 7 international peer-reviewed articles. authorOrder lrlr-2007-3-verspechtann 4 authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-fukushimamichio 6 Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor, Malaysia author baraualiyu Aliyu Salisu Barau Aliyu Salisu Barau earned B.Sc Geography, and MSc Land Resources Development from Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria. He participated in a number of research projects on urban development, tourism, and landscape sustainability in northern Nigeria. His PhD research at the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia investigates globalisation and landscape fragmentation in Iskandar Malaysia economic city. He is interested in multidisciplinary and coupled human and natural systems research. Aliyu is a member of International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE), American Geophysical Union, Society for Urban Ecology (SURE) and International Union for Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP). OPENspace Research Centre, Edinburgh College of Art, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK author oliveiraeva Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira is a PhD student at Edinburgh College of Art. She got her degree in Landscape Architecture at Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisbon Technical University, in 2004. Her research interests cover the use of public open spaces by ethnic minorities and immigrant communities. Her current investigation focuses on the use of Lisbon's public open spaces by three immigrant communities. She has also collaborated as a research assistant at OpenSpace and has participated at Cost Action E39 - "Trees, forests and human health and well-being". authorOrder lrlr-2010-2-oliveiraeva 3 authorOrder lrlr-2011-2-zhanghuiyuan 2 Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise St., Tartu, Estonia, 51014 author manderulo Ülo Mander Dr. Ülo Mander (1954) is Professor of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology and Head of the Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences at the University of Tartu, Estonia. He received a BSc in physical geography (1977) and PhD in biology/ecology (1983) at the University of Tartu, Estonia. Prof. Mander's research and teaching has focused on landscape ecology (nutrient cycling at landscape and catchment levels) and ecological engineering (constructed wetlands and riparian buffer zones: design and performance). He has written over 200 papers and edited 25 books and special issues of international peer reviewed journals in these fields. He has been visiting scientist/visiting professor at various universities and research centers (University of Kiel, Germany, Lund University and University of Linköping, Sweden, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape and Land Use Research, Germany, National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, Sapporo, Japan; The Ohio State University, USA). He is member of editorial board of 7 international peer reviewed journals. authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-trautweinclemens 10 Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Universität Wien, A-1030 Rennweg 14, Vienna, Austria author hermannanna Anna Hermann Anna Hermann is a graduate Ecologist and PhD candidate at the University of Vienna, Department of Nature Conservation, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology. Her main research interests are landscape- and vegetation ecology with special emphasis on biodiversity research and the assessment of ecosystem services. She is working on national and international EU funded projects focusing on landscape structure analysis and its function as sustainable pest control in organic farming systems, the relationship between landscape structure and biodiversity, the assessment of ecosystem services in transnational ecological networks as well as projects with special regard to nature conservation issues. Since 2008 she is active as lecturer in the field of restoration ecology and nature conservation with special focus on habitat mapping. 3 publication lrlr-2009-3 The Dimensions of Place Meanings 2009-07-29 2009-06-29 2009-06-01 meaning creation place meanings place attachment This article aims to give an overview of how place meanings are created and how they influence people's sense of belonging. It should be noted that the current literature has various shortcomings which mostly result from the lack of interdisciplinary research. The studies in place attachment usually focus on personal sense of belonging leaving aside those extending over various scales -- such as, for instance, national identity. Also, place meanings and identity are primarily discussed as the very personal phenomena. On the contrary, place making and shaping is usually seen through more structural viewpoint by claiming that places mainly change in result of political or economic processes. Nowadays, there are even claims that due to the influx of globalization place no more matters and similar processes will happen everywhere. This notion does not take into account the special character of every place and the fact that outside forces come together in different ways in every place. Authors suggest that these different perspectives need to be united in order to fully grasp the character of place making and place meanings. In current articles, authors have adopted the multi-disciplinary approach and understood the place as uniting different processes starting from deeply personal meaning creation and ending with changes happening in global scale. 3 authorOrder lrlr-2007-3-vanhuylenbroeckguido 1 2 publication lrlr-2008-2 How to Achieve Effectiveness in Problem-Oriented Landscape Research: The Example of Research on Biotic Invasions 2008-07-15 2008-07-01 biotic invasions transdisciplinary research boundary management It is increasingly expected from environmental research such as landscape research that science directly contributes to the solving of pressing societal problems. However, despite increased efforts to direct research towards societal problems, it is not obvious if science has become more effective in supporting environmental problem-solving. We present in this article a framework that facilitates the analysis and design of problem-orientation in research fields. We then apply the proposed framework to a concrete example of a problem-oriented landscape research field - namely research on biotic invasions. Invasion research addresses the problem that some organisms, that have been introduced by humans to a new geographic area where they were previously not present, spread in the landscape and pose negative impacts. We argue that problem-oriented research is more than applied research. Besides research on specific questions it also encompasses boundary management, i.e., deliberations among experts and stakeholders on the framing of adequate research questions about processes, values and practices for effective problem-solving. We postulate that such research may assist problem-solving in three ways, by analysing causal relationships (systems knowledge), clarifying conflicts of interests and values (target knowledge), or contributing to the development of appropriate means for action (transformation knowledge). We show that over the past decades a broad range of different research approaches has emerged in the young field of invasion research in order to produce systems, target and transformation knowledge for invasive species management. Early research in the field was dominated by the development of systems knowledge, but increasingly the three knowledge forms are treated more equally. The research field has also become more interdisciplinary and context-specific. Boundary management in invasion research is mainly restricted to informal networks (communities of practice), while formal processes such as transdisciplinary research are scarce. We suggest that the paucity of structured and explicit boundary management processes will limit the future development of a more effective science for invasive species management. In particular, we envisage three obstacles that can only be removed through explicit boundary management. First, the existing theoretical frameworks are currently only partly able to integrate natural and social sciences research on the processes underlying invasions. Second, a clarification of the normative thinking about alien plant invasions is needed. Third, research on transformation knowledge has so far not fundamentally challenged the existing conceptual framing and institutional setup of invasive species management. 2 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, PR China author zhenlin Lin Zhen Dr. Lin Zhen is the deputy director of Department of Resource Ecology and Bioenergy Research of IGSNRR. Her fields of study include ecosystem change and payment for ecosystem services, impact assessment of land use and multifunctionality, participatory natural resources management. In recent years, Dr. Lin Zhen has focused very much on application and adoption of research results to decision making process in China. She is coordinating national and international research projects, and has published about 100 articles in international and domestic peer reviewed journals, and edited several books. Dr Lin Zhen is the Chinese coordinator of Chinese-German Centre for Impact Assessment (http://www.cgcia.org), jointly established between IGSNRR in China and ZALF in Germany. arefiev St. Petersburg, Russia ebMember arefiev Nikolai Arefiev 1 publication lrlr-2007-2 Outdoor Recreation and Nature Tourism: A European Perspective 2007-06-25 2007-04-18 2007-04-07 ecotourism sustainable tourism recreation conflicts forest recreation visitor monitoring recreation trends health and well-being Recreation and nature tourism are increasingly important activities with many implications both economic and environmental. As society changes so the demands and trends for recreation and nature tourism change and develop. This poses many challenges for planners and managers of recreational areas and providers of services. This review article focuses on the situation in Europe but does not ignore some major trends and issues arising elsewhere, while much of the research can be traced back to ideas and methods developed elsewhere, such as the U.S.A. To set the scene the main social and environmental trends are presented that show how the changing nature of society feeds through in expectations and demands for recreation and nature tourism. Demographic changes, consumer behaviour and the increasingly mobile and connected lifestyles of European citizens have produced trends for outdoor recreation preferences and for broadening travel horizons. Knowing about these trends enables planners and entrepreneurs to change their recreation or tourism offer to meet these demands. However, these demands have to be seen in the context of changing pressures and sensitivities of the environments, frequently natural, in which recreation and nature tourism activities are located. Climate change is a prime example of these pressures. Many countries have developed sophisticated survey and other monitoring tools and instruments to identify demand, to monitor levels and types of activity, changing preferences and pressures on the environment. While recreation is often led by demand from people who wish to participate in certain activities there are also increasingly well recognised benefits to health and well-being from closer contact with nature. Policy makers in the health sphere are taking a keen interest in this and in the means for encouraging sedentary populations to engage with physical activity in natural environments. The evidence base for this is improving and is reviewed in this paper. Management of environments and visitors produces many conflicts which must be resolved. Recent surveys of forest recreation have enabled a European-wide pattern to be identified which will help planners and managers identify issues to be considered. The paper draws on work being undertaken as part of two EU funded Cost Actions: ``Cost E33: Forest Recreation and Nature Tourism'' and ``Cost E39: Forests, Trees and Human Health and Well-being''. These allow experts from around Europe to network and to pool research and practice. 2 authorOrder lrlr-2010-2-zuinaffonso 4 authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-muharsusanne 7 Centre for Innovative Planning and Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor, Malaysia author ludinanm A.N.M. Ludin Dr. A.N.M. Ludin is a Professor at the Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). He received his MSc in Applied Remote Sensing from Cranfield Institute of Technology, UK and PhD in Remote Sensing/GIS from University of Bristol, UK. He specialises in the teaching and application of GIS and remote sensing in urban and regional planning research. Dr Ludin is currently the Dean of the Faculty of Built Environment, UTM. Apart from his administrative duties, he is involved in several multidisciplinary research and consultancy projects particularly in spatial analysis using GIS and remote sensing tools. authorOrder lrlr-2010-2-bellsimon 1 Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Bonn, Germany author teichmannhanka Hanka Teichmann Hanka Teichmann is a food chemist with special interest in environmental and health issues of food and food production. She works for Federal Agency for Nature Conservation and is involved in the risk assessment and regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in Germany. She and her colleagues are responsible for the evaluation of potential risks for nature and environment. In a current research project she deals with the improvement of risk assessment for non-target organisms and biodiversity. Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Dept. of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Max-Emanuel-Strasse 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria author muharsusanne Susanne Muhar Susanne Muhar is Associate Professor at the Inst. of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management in Vienna, Austria. Her research work is focused on methods for assessing the physical environment of riverine landscapes, concepts and methods of ecological river management and river restoration and the evaluation of river restoration programmes; current projects include the analyses of effects of the implementation of water related directives (Water Framework Directive, Habitat and Birds-Directive), the relationship between hydro-morphological conditions and land use patterns and the self purification capacity of small rivers and the development of causal models in sustainable river catchment management. authorOrder lrlr-2008-3-meeussteven 1 authorOrder lrlr-2009-3-palanghannes 2 authorOrder lrlr-2010-3-graeffrieder 1 authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-fullertonaimee 3 University of Osnabrück, Institute of Environmental Systems Research (USF), Barbarastrasse 12, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany author schulzmarcus Marcus Schulz Dr. Marcus Schulz is a senior scientist at the Institute of Environmental Systems Research. He studied Geology and Biology at the University of Göttingen and wrote his PhD thesis on the methane cycle in Lake Constance. He has worked many years on sedimentological, biogeochemical, microbiological, and geobotanical topics mainly in aquatic systems and is currently investigating the run-off, transport and sedimentation of pollutants during extreme flood events in the Mulde catchment, a main tributary of the Elbe River in Germany. Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife, Oregon State University, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA and current affiliation: Amnis Opes Institute, 2895 SE Glenn Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA author hughesrobert Robert M. Hughes Ecological assessments of surface waters and regional patterns in aquatic biota. Developed and tested methods for sampling fish in New England lakes and non-wadeable Oregon rivers. Co-authored the fish assemblage and fish tissue chapters in the EMAP field protocols for wadeable streams and non-wadeable rivers. Refined the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for use in small Oregon streams, Appalachian streams, a large Oregon river, the Seine River of France, the Kshipra and Khan Rivers in India, Pacific Northwest rivers, and western USA streams and rivers. Co-authored USEPA's Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Fish and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and provided technical expertise to the USEPA's Steering Committee on Biological Criteria, Ecological Indicators Work Group, and Tiered Aquatic Life Uses Work Group. Served as External Evaluator of the Heinz Center State of the Nation's Ecosystems Report, European Fish Index, National Research Agency of France (ANR), and University of Minnesota Great Lakes Environmental Indicators. Currently applying ecological assessment and monitoring protocols to Brazilian stream, river, and reservoir ecosystems. Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Dept. of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Max-Emanuel-Strasse 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria author poppemichaela Michaela Poppe Michaela Poppe is PhD student at the Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management in Vienna, Austria. She got her MSc in Geography at the University of Vienna. Her research interests cover riverine landscape typology and pattern and the analyses of land use and landscape metrics at different spatial scales. Currently, she is involved in an EU funded project on identifying causal models in sustainable river catchment management. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany and Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Bonn, Germany author graeffrieder Frieder Graef Dr. Frieder Graef (1966) is working both at the Federal Agency of Nature Conservation (BfN) and at the Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) in Müncheberg. He got a PhD in Agriculture (1994) at the University of Hohenheim, Germany. At the BfN he is involved in the risk assessment and regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in Germany. His specific research focus at ZALF is on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), especially in cultivation systems, and strategies for monitoring their potential effects on biodiversity and ecosystems. He was involved in various projects and activities dealing with the coordination and harmonisation of GMO monitoring data exchange and with concepts to increases the explanatory power and representativeness of locally collected data and upscale them to larger regions. 6 publication 2012-01-25 Intersection of Landscape, Anthropocene and Fourth Paradigm 2012-07-11 lrlr-2012-1 2012-06-18 urbanisation anthropocene globalisation landscape fourth paradigm This review explores landscape science in the proposed age of the Anthropocene and Fourth Paradigm. Both the Anthropocene and the Fourth Paradigm put landscape science to task, due to the severity of landscape challenges. The article aims to link the concepts of the Anthropocene, the Fourth Paradigm and landscape sustainability in the 21st century. Different sources of publications and information were used to analyse, synthesise and explain the state of landscape research. We searched Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contents on this article’s key themes – globalisation, urbanisation, the Anthropocene and the Fourth Paradigm. We argue that globalisation and urbanisation are the key driving forces behind landscape change. These driving forces represent the scales of human impact on landscapes. Landscape science plays a major role in the age of data revolution and unprecedented landscape change. The review suggests that landscape scientists and landscape societies should chart a new course for landscape research to exploit the benefits of data to advance landscape sustainability. 1 authorOrder lrlr-2007-3-mettepenningenevy 3 authorOrder lrlr-2007-1-matthiesmichael 2 authorOrder lrlr-2009-1-uuemaaevelin 1 authorOrder lrlr-2007-2-proebstlulrike 4 OPENspace Research Centre, Edinburgh College of Art, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK author alvessusana Susana Alves Susana Alves works as a research associate at OPENspace Research Centre at Edinburgh College of Art. She is an environmental psychologist with special interest in urban outdoor environments and health. Her research has focused on older people with an special concern in promoting positive experiences that sustain health and well-being of an older population. During the last four years, she has been involved in two main research projects: I'DGO (Inclusive Design for Getting Outdoor) a 4-year project to determine whether Home Zone streets are a good design solution for older people in the UK and PLUREL (Peri-urban Land Use Relationships), part of the EU 6th Framework Programme, where her work concentrates on investigation the interrelationship between retirement migration and land use. Past research includes studying favorite places for older adults in Brazil and examining the effects of nature-related activities for nursing home residents in the US. A main concern behind her research work is to translate research findings in design recommendations. Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, K.U. Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium author meeussteven Steven J. Meeus Steven Meeus obtained the Master in Bioscience Engineering in the field of Land Management in 2003 at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. After graduation, he started researching landscapes under supervision of Prof. H. Gulinck at the department of Earth and Environmental Sciences of the K.U. Leuven, first investigating surface sealing for the Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij (the Flemish environmental agency) and is now finishing a PhD research on Landscape Indicators as measurement tools for sustainability in Semi Urban Areas. costanza Burlington, U.S.A. ebMember costanza Robert Costanza Editor in Chief 4 publication lrlr-2010-2 Migration and Land Use Change in Europe: A Review 2010-08-28 2010-07-07 2010-03-22 NUTS International retirement migration Urbanisation DPSIR Europe Push-pull factors Land use change Migration within Europe and between Europe and other parts of the world is a major driver of population change and has far reaching effects on land use. The theory, historical trends and actual patterns of migration were reviewed and from these an understanding of different categories of migration was developed. The pressures for land use change caused by different types of migration were developed and interpreted into a map of Europe, resolved at NUTSx level and a set of descriptions of land use change projections, examples of which are presented. The paper suggests that the implications of migration on land use change need further research and better data in order to be able to be more certain of trends. In the modern world migration will continue to be a major influence on land use and European policies which consider migration and land use as separate issues are likely to miss important connections. 2 authorOrder lrlr-2009-3-saarmaarja 1 Landscape Ecology and Recovery Science, NW Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, 2725 Montlake Blvd. East, Seattle, WA, 98112, USA and current affiliation: PNW Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 3625 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512, USA author steelashley E. Ashley Steel Ashley Steel is the Station Statistician for the USDA Forest Service PNW Research Station. She is a quantitative research scientist and consulting statistician. Her research interests include the development of methods for linking landscape-scale patterns with in-stream responses, quantification of complex ecological time series such as riverine thermal regimes, and model sensitivity analysis. Ashley hopes to leverage statistical tools to improve ecological understanding and to demonstrate how the quantification of uncertainty can be used to improve the management of natural resources. Before joining the PNW Research Station in October 2009, Ashley was the Team Lead for the Landscape Ecology and Recovery Science Team at NOAA's Northwest Fisheries Science Center. She has a PhD in Quantitative Ecology and Resource Management (QERM) and MS degrees in Ecology and in Statistics from the University of Washington. authorOrder lrlr-2011-2-zhenlin 1 Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise St., Tartu, Estonia, 51014 author marjariho Riho Marja Riho Marja (1982) is a Phd student of landscape ecology and environment protection at the Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia. He also works for the Agricultural Research Centre, Estonian Ministry of Agriculture. He got his MSc degree in physical geography from the University of Tartu (2007). His research interest covers relationships of farmland bird communities with landscape pattern, land use structure, and agri-environmental schemes. Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise St., Tartu, Estonia, 51014 author roosaarejuri Jüri Roosaare Dr. Jüri Roosaare (1953) is the Associate Professor in geoinformatics at the Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu Estonia. He got a PhD in geography (landscape geophysics) at the Moscow State University (1982). His research interests include applications of GIS in landscape ecology (simulation modelling of water cycle and land use changes in watersheds, analysis of spatial patterns), curriculum development in geoinformatics and philosophical problems of geography. Since 2004 he is member of the Steering Committee of IGU Commission on Geographical Information Systems. authorOrder lrlr-2008-2-kuefferchristoph 1 FSP BIOGUM, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany author schuettegesine Gesine Schütte Gesine is scientist at the interdisciplinary research center for Biotechnology, Society and the Environment at the University of Hamburg. She has assessed agronomic and ecological implications of new plant varieties and agricultural measures in the context of the agricultural system for several German federal agencies. In doing so the principal focus was on production, net income and biodiversity impacts. Her presentations of project results contributed to the national and international discussion on green biotechnology. A further subject of her research are effects of land use patterns on biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Gesine´s general objective is to compare and develop concepts for the sustainable use of biological resources. These concepts may comprise structural, social and technical (high and low tech) solutions. She has a degree in biology, political sciences and educational science and received a PhD in ecology. Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, K.U. Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Leuven, Belgium author gulinckhubert Hubert Gulinck The current research activities of Hubert Gulinck are about the transformation of land use in Flanders (Belgium) and their underlying causes, landscape impacts of large scale developments and the role of landscape as communication medium between stakeholders, and sustainability of semi-urban landscapes linked to remnant open spaces and garden complexes. Recently he started a project on landscape and land use factors in human health issues in northern Tanzania, but he has also been active in other countries, a.o. China in research on land use changes and environmental impacts. Hubert Gulinck is furthermore active in diverse networks related to landscape, rural development and spatial planning in Flanders. He teaches in Leuven and in Gent, with courses on Landscape Analysis and Rural Land Use. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany author haasedagmar Dagmar Haase Dagmar Haase is a post-doctoral researcher at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. She got a PhD in Landscape Ecology and Geography and recently co-ordinates the research work on urban modelling at the Department of Computational Landscape Ecology at the UFZ. In this field, her research speciality is spatially explicit modelling of land use changes, urban growth and shrinkage. Another subject of her current research refers to urban ecosystem services and their modelling including flood impact and risk assessment. Dr. Haase coordinates the Leipzig case study and the modelling activities in the PLUREL EU-IP on peri-urban land use relationships. 4 publication lrlr-2010-1 Are We Meeting the Challenges of Landscape-Scale Riverine Research? A Review 2010-06-18 2010-05-10 2009-11-20 Catchment scale River management Landscape patterns Watershed scale Riverine ecology Aquatic ecosystems Identifying and quantifying relationships among landscape patterns, anthropogenic disturbances, and aquatic ecosystems is a new and rapidly developing approach to riverine ecology. In this review, we begin by describing the policy and management drivers for landscape-scale riverine research and we synthesize the technological advances that have enabled dramatic progress in the field. We then describe the development of landscape-scale riverine research through a series of landmark theoretical and review papers. Focusing on landscape-fish relationships, we consider the degree to which past efforts have been successful at meeting three key challenges: (1) Has new research effectively incorporated the strengths of new technologies or are we doing the same old thing with more expensive data? (2) Have we incorporated key concepts from landscape ecology to improve our understanding of how landscapes affect rivers? (3) Have we been able to use landscape analyses to address management and policy needs? We conclude with a review of opportunities for advancement in the field of landscape-scale riverine research. These include moving toward the development of mechanistic theories of how landscapes affect rivers across disparate regions; considering the spatio-temporal structure of human impacts to landscapes; harnessing new statistical tools; and carefully defining landscape and response metrics to capture specific features. 1 authorOrder lrlr-2007-2-sievainentuija 3 Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Kurt-Wolters-Str. 3, D-34109 Kassel, Germany author schaldachruediger Rüdiger Schaldach Rüdiger Schaldach is senior scientist at the Center for Environmental Systems Research. He studied computer science and geoecology in Karlsruhe and Braunschweig. His main research interests are in the fields of spatial modelling of land-use systems and sustainable use of natural resources. Current research projects include the development of global scale modelling approaches and the application of land-use modelling techniques in context of sustainable water management in the Jordan River region. OPENspace Research Centre, Edinburgh College of Art, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK and DFT, Federal University of Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil author zuinaffonso Affonso Zuin Affonso Zuin is research associate at the OPENspace Research Centre at Edinburgh College of Art and senior lecturer in landscape design and ornamental horticulture at the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil. With his background in agronomy/horticulture and landscape architecture, his special interest is in research tools for people-environment studies, access to the outdoors, and organic production techniques for tropical flower crops. He has been involved in design projects for public, institutional and private spaces in Brazil and India. Recent research includes the EU 6th Framework Programme Integrated Project PLUREL: peri-urban land use relationships; IDGO TOO -Inclusive Design for Getting Outdoors, Phase 2, funded by the EPSRC; 'Tropical flower production in agroforestry systems', funded by FAPEMIG; and previously, locally funded projects on organic cultivation of Heliconiaceae, the assessment of gardening techniques and practices in Viçosa, Brazil. Ghent University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Coupue Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium author verspechtann Ann Verspecht Ann Verspecht has obtained a master of science in Bio-Engineering at the University of Leuven in 1998. She works in the domain of Agricultural Economics since 2001. Her main fields of interest are policy related research in the field of multifunctional farming and agri-environmental schemes, possibilities for agriculture in peri-urban zones and she has been closely involved in the evaluation of different Flemish Rural Development plans. 5 publication lrlr-2011-3 Landscape Structure, Landscape Metrics and Biodiversity 2011-11-04 2011-10-06 2011-03-01 landscape mosaic nature conservation biological diversity landscape functions landscape pattern landscape management heterogeneity spatial planning This paper deals with the question of the role landscape metrics can play in the investigation, evaluation and monitoring of landscape structure, and which linkages between landscape structure and biodiversity are known. In the first part, the scientific state of the art is presented; in the second part, the meaning of landscape metrics for nature protection, landscape management and biodiversity monitoring is discussed. A number of studies indicate that such metrics on an aggregated, overall landscape level are quite appropriate to describe the state of biodiversity. On the other hand, gaps in the knowledge become apparent, and the results of such studies are strongly dependent on the scale of investigation and the underlying database. Nevertheless, the landscape structure approach seems to be expedient for management and planning at the landscape level. 3 authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-steelashley 1 authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-youngjohn 5 authorOrder lrlr-2008-2-hirschhadorngertrude 2 kienast Birmensdorf, Switzerland ebMember kienast Felix Kienast Editor in Chief 2 publication lrlr-2008-1 Integrated Models of the Land System: A Review of Modelling Approaches on the Regional to Global Scale 2008-04-05 2008-03-25 2008-03-14 land system human-environment interactions integrated modelling Land-use change has been identified as one the most important processes to understand and to model global change. It is the result of complex interactions between human and environmental driving factors. A key to capturing this complexity is the analytical framework of land systems as coupled human-environment systems, a concept that is a central component of the science plan of the Global Land Project. Based on this framework, this paper presents an overview of eight integrated models of the land system. The review concentrates on model approaches that include processes of both the human and the environment sub-system and which operate in a spatially explicit manner on a regional to global scale. Another criterion used to select models is that they take into account interplay and competition between different land-use activities, e.g. between agriculture and urban development. Each model is reviewed separately in detail with focus on the different aspects of the land system that are represented within the model and on the implemented modelling concepts. This is done by systematically addressing the following topics: model purpose and application, model concepts for the human sub-system and for the environment sub-system and linkages between the sub-systems (model integration). Based on these findings commonalities and differences between the models are discussed and further research needs are identified. 1 Center for Landscape and Culture, Estonian Institute of Humanities, Tallinn University, Uus-Sadama 5, 10120 Tallinn author palanghannes Hannes Palang Dr Hannes Palang (1968) is a geographer interested in culture in the landscape. He is professor of human geography and head the Center for Landscape and Culture at the Tallinn University. He is also the President of the Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape. His past research ranges from landscape diversity indexes to local participation and time layers. He has been involved in many applied projects in planning valuable landscapes and assessing their values. 2 publication lrlr-2008-3 Semi-Urban Areas in Landscape Research: A Review 2008-12-09 2008-11-17 2008-08-27 urban fringe semi-urban areas sprawl Urbanization is a well-known topic in sustainable development debates as it is known to have great impacts on landscape and environment. Low density, apparently random, scattered or fragmented and leap frogging forms of urban land use, not classified as core urban fabric (town, city, ...) nor classified as real ‘countryside’ are studied in this paper. With a thorough literature study of more than 200 publications, a number of interesting conclusions about this important environmental and socio-economical phenomenon can be made. At first, it is generally described as either a type of land use or land use dynamic functioning as ‘divide’ between city and countryside (the urban fringe theory), or it is very often described as the dynamic and fast transformation of rural land into urban land (the sprawl approach). In some cases it forms its own ‘landscape’ and it is called the peri-urban or more correctly semi-urban area. Generally, there seems to be a lack of good definitions and frameworks, although it is studied often and in various scientific disciplines. Prominently, there is an always present dichotomy between rural and urban in all concepts, theories and definitions proposed. 3 authorOrder lrlr-2010-1-poppemichaela 8 authorOrder lrlr-2007-2-bellsimon 1 authorOrder lrlr-2008-1-schaldachruediger 1 cramer Potsdam, Germany ebMember cramer Wolfgang Cramer authorOrder lrlr-2010-4-semmkadri 1 The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Unit, Helsinki Unit, Unioninkatu 40 A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland author sievainentuija Tuija Sievänen Tuija Sievänen works in the Finnish Forest Research Institute (METLA) as the project leader for outdoor recreation studies in Helsinki, Finland. She is the coordinator of the National Outdoor Recrea-tion Demand and Supply Inventory (LVVI) -study. She is involved in developing visitor survey and counting methods with the Finnish Forest and Parks Service. Tuija Sievänen works in the Finnish Forest Research Institute (METLA) as the project leader for outdoor recreation studies in Helsinki, Finland. She is the coordinator of the National Outdoor Recreation Demand and Supply Inventory (LVVI)-study. She is involved in developing visitor survey and counting methods with the Finnish Forest and Parks Service. authorOrder lrlr-2010-3-teichmannhanka 4 mander Tartu, Estonia ebMember mander Ülo Mander 3 publication lrlr-2009-1 Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research 2009-03-17 2009-03-01 2008-10-28 Landscape aesthetics Landscape pattern Biodiversity Landscape planning Landscape ecology FRAGSTATS The aim of this overview paper is to analyze the use of various landscape metrics and landscape indices for the characterization of landscape structure and various processes at both landscape and ecosystem level. We analyzed the appearance of the terms landscape metrics/indexes/indices in combination with seven main categories in the field of landscape ecology [1) use/selection and misuse of metrics, 2) biodiversity and habitat analysis; 3) water quality; 4) evaluation of the landscape pattern and its change; 5) urban landscape pattern, road network; 6) aesthetics of landscape; 7) management, planning and monitoring] in the titles, abstracts and/or key words of research papers published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals indexed by the Institute of Science Information (ISI) Web of Science (WoS) from 1994 to October 2008. Most of the landscape metrics and indices are used concerning biodiversity and habitat analysis, and also the evaluation of landscape pattern and its change (up to 25 articles per year). There are only a few articles on the relationships of landscape metrics/indices/indexes to social aspects and landscape perception. 1 a-wiggering Müncheberg, Germany ebMember wiggering Hubert Wiggering Editor in Chief Center for Landscape and Culture, Estonian Institute of Humanities, Tallinn University, Uus-Sadama 5, 10120 Tallinn author saarmaarja Maarja Saar Maarja Saar (1987) studies anthropology at the Tallinn University, Estonia, and geography at the University of Wisconsin Madison, USA, and worked as a research assistant at the Center for Landscape and Culture at the Tallinn University. Her main research interest lies in urban geography, specifically she is engaged in place meaning and place identity studies. She is currently studying the area of blockhouses in Tallinn and also deals with post-soviet urban space. authorOrder lrlr-2007-2-simpsonmurray 5 authorOrder lrlr-2009-1-roosaarejuri 3 dalchow Müncheberg, Germany teamMember dalchow Claus Dalchow Managing Editor 4 publication lrlr-2010-4 Landscape Accessibility: Spaces for Accessibility or Spaces for Communication? 2010-10-07 2010-09-20 2010-05-06 Power Accessibility Exclusion Border Discourse Law Urbanization Property This article gives an overview of contemporary studies on landscape accessibility. We focus on the broadened meaning of the term, where accessibility is not delimited with territorial access. The overview of landscape accessibility is widened by post-structural approaches. Discursive, socio-political and semiotic aspects are introduced, and the examples of different emerging conflicts, such as exclusion, segregation, or the creation of different social identities, are presented. In the discussion, additional need for understanding accessibility as the creation of spaces for communication is argued pointing to the valuing of conflicting meanings in accessibility-inaccessibility opposition. 4 hainesyoung Nottingham, U.K. ebMember hainesyoung Roy Haines-Young The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Rovaniemi Research Unit, PL 16, FI-96301 Rovaniemi, Finland author tyrvainenliisa Liisa Tyrväinen Liisa Tyrväinen (Dr. Sc.) is a professor of nature tourism at METLA (Finnish Forest Research Institute), Finland. She has published around 30 papers in international peer-reviewed journals and books and more than 100 titles in total. Her research work has focused on social and economic valuation of amenity benefits of forests as well as analyzing social values and meanings of forests to the general public. Her research experience includes developing methods for enhancing tourism and recreational use of forests as a tool in rural development. johnson St Lucia, Australia ebMember johnson Andrew Johnson Editor in Chief authorOrder lrlr-2008-1-priessjoerg 2 4 publication lrlr-2010-3 Scale Implications for Environmental Risk Assessment and Monitoring of the Cultivation of Genetically Modified Herbicide-Resistant Sugar Beet: A Review 2010-09-18 2010-07-27 2010-06-09 Risk assessment Genetically modified herbicide resistance Sugar beet Monitoring Spatial scales Genetically modified herbicide-resistant (GMHR) sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) has been cultivated in the US for several years and an application has been submitted for cultivation in Europe. Concerns have been raised about how GMHR sugar beet cultivation might impair the agro-environment. European legislation for GM plants requires, prior to their commercial import and/or cultivation, a stepwise reduction of the containment and a gradual increase in the scale of release. Experimental results gained during this procedure enter an environmental risk assessment; after the GM plant approval, a systematic monitoring of potential adverse environmental effects is required. We collected information on sugar beet biology and cultivation and the HR technology. We categorised the literature findings, evaluated the evidence of agro-environmental effects and indicated adverse effects. The impacts are directly and indirectly linked to sugar beet biology and/or to the HR technology. Most likely are a) adverse herbicide effects on field organisms, aquatic communities and soil microbial communities, b) persistence of the GM plant triggered by a potential selective advantage and/or genetic drift after hybridisation of GMHR cultivated, feral and weed beet with neighbouring beets and wild relatives, c) the increase of HR in weeds and subsequent increase and/or change in the herbicide application regime after several years of glyphosate application, and d) decline in agrobiodiversity (weed communities, herbivores, pollinators and beneficial species). Our study reveals a lack of experimental data on potential agro-environmental effects. This suggests that the principle of a stepwise scale increase of release is inadequately applied to the GMHR sugar beet approval process. The adverse effects identified should prompt further research experiments to gain information for the ERA and/or specific monitoring activities at the respective identified spatial scale levels. 3 authorOrder lrlr-2008-3-gulinckhubert 2 Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Universität Wien, A-1030 Rennweg 14, Vienna, Austria author wrbkathomas Thomas Wrbka Dr. Thomas Wrbka is senior research fellow and senior lecturer at the University of Vienna, Department of Nature Conservation, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology. His main research topics are landscape-, vegetation- and restoration ecology with special focus on cultural landscape classification, the use of landscape structure as sustainability indicator and to explain biodiversity pattern, the assessment of landscape functionality and the application of remote sensing in landscape ecology. Since 1983 he has participated in numerous national and international (funded by Central Europe as well as EU framework programmes) research projects in the domain of landscape ecology focusing on biological indicators, landscape functionality assessment, European regionalisation and landscape characterisation. He has also been involved in several comprehensive studies for managing river systems, national parks and other protective areas to provide a standard in conservation practice. He is member of scientific advisory boards of several conservation related NGOs and authorities. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Bonn, Germany author winkelbirgit Birgit Winkel Birgit Winkel is biologist specialised in microbiology, biochemistry and ecology. Since 2002 she is involved in the risk assessment of the introduction of genetically modified plants into the environment as a regulator in the European approval process. She is especially engaged in the assessment of potential adverse effects on nature and the environment. At the Technical University of Berlin she developed and evaluated ecotoxicological test methods for the assessment of soils.